Showing posts with label HUD. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HUD. Show all posts

8/15/2019

It Just Got Easier to Buy and Sell Condos with FHA

Downtown Long Beach condo view
As I've previously posted,  condos haven't gotten a break from HUD for a long time.  Many HOAs, if not most, in Long Beach lost their FHA certification and didn't renew it.  It was once a permanent approval, but due to the 2009 and later mortgage fallouts, HUD required HOAs to renew their FHA loan approvals every two years.  For most Boards, that's a nano-second.  Plus, HUD removed the ability to get a "spot" approval, meaning a single unit could be approved for an FHA purchase, even if the rest of the HOA was not approved.

Finally, HUD is giving back.  Effective October 15, 2019, the new rules (click on the title link) will:

Extend the approval period from two to three years;
Allow for "spot" approvals, those single unit mortgage approvals, up to 20% (currently, none are allowed);
Allow additional flexibility in the ratio of investors to owner-occupants in the association, between 25-75% (currently, 50% owner occupancy required).

To give an idea of how this will help FHA buyers, nationally there are more than 8.7 million condo units, but only 17,792 FHA condo loans were originated in the last year, according to the National Association of Realtors.

These loans changes may also come under specific lenders' requirements, so who you work with on youir FHA loan may have an impact on what HOA may or may not be eligible.  However, since lenders want to make loans, there should be a lot of incentive to help a qualified buyer complete a condo purchase.
These new changes are very beneficial to condo sellers, who should find a buyer faster when not owning in an HOA-approved building.

If you are interested in finding out about a condo purchase, Please contact me.  I've been helping buyers and sellers since 1994!


Julia Huntsman, REALTOR, Broker | www.juliahuntsman.com | 562-896-2609 | California Lic. #01188996

1/02/2016

Top Concerns for the 2016 Market



Although the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau states "no problem", many REALTORs are experiencing delayed closing with the new TRID (TILA/RESPA Integrated Disclosure) rules implemented October 3rd.  For about half of those responding to a survey, closings took up to 40 days to close.  While this may not be of concern to all-cash buyers, buyers obtaining financing and sellers in contract with those buyers may have to be prepared for taking extra time to close, at least while the industry is in the earlier phase of these new mortgage/escrow rules.

Some years ago FHA revised their rules on eligible condo HOAs--Since an entire association was required to become "FHA-approved", and for only two years at a time, the number of approved condos has declined severely.  This reduces the number of eligible buyers for a condominium severely and is a factor everywhere for FHA condo buyers.  Association members are advised to take up this issue with their boards -HUD provides a resource for current status - and apply for renewal.  Some lenders are willing to provide this service without cost, especially if there is an  active buyer for that complex.  Contact me for more information.  VA approvals for condos are also required for VA buyers, and these are another important source of condo buyers.   However, for buyers obtaining FNMA loans there are no restrictions on percent of owner-occupied units, a major qualifier on FHA loans. 

Tight inventories are still a factor nationwide, as buyers can attest to after they have experienced multiple offer situations.  Buyers who are fully approved and prepared to make realistic offers have more success, although the price range under $500,000 in many Southern California cities is competitive.  Below is a trend chart for "months of inventory" for Long Beach.  Neighboring cities are similar.  A 6-month supply (how long the inventory would last at the current rate of sale) is considered the norm, but has not been the norm for several years. The chart shows 1.5 months.


Tight credit standards continue to affect sales.  There was a time when a 700 FICO score meant smooth sailing, but the average FICO score on all closed loans in the third quarter was 723, the lowest level in at least four years, according to Ellie Mae. Two years ago, the average score for denied applications was 729.  In other words, keep up your credit score but minimizing debt and no delinquencies.

Low appraisals continue to be problematic.  This is a large subject by itself, but the short summary is: Find a good REALTOR to work with, whether you're a buyer or a seller, and avoid over-inflated pricing.

More Trends:

Cash sales continue to decrease; buyers are interested in walkable areas (check the WalkScore for your neighborhood), "green" homes, or older homes with upgraded environmental efficiency, are on the buyer lists in many areas, new home sales are up in some areas (however, older Southern California cities are less impacted by this demographic), rents may increase by as much as 8% in some areas, so buying at today's lower interest rates will still be cheaper than renting.

For a free property search, go to www.juliahuntsman.com Property search page.

Please contact me for a more specific home analysis for your property.  As a licensed REALTOR for over 20 years, I can help whether you have a home or investment property sell.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

3/30/2015

New Transaction Closing Rules -- Starting August 1 by CFPB

Be Careful Crossing the Road of Financial Protection
The Consumer Financial Protection  Bureau was brought into being by the Dodd-Frank legislation, and the CFPB has teeth which are being inserted into the lives of lenders, and therefore the lives of home buyers and sellers.

The "Know Before You Owe" rule, effective August 1, 2015, is bringing a new closing document (6 pages) and is doing away with our HUD-1 statement (3 pages) in the form of a non-uniform closing package which does away with the uniform coded costs which have been in existence for . . . decades.  By non-uniform is meant that lenders can call their categories what they so choose, and therefore may be different from one bank to another all across the country.  On the other hand, "the new forms resolve the problem of redundant and overlapping information presented in the standard Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and Truth In Lending Act (TILA) disclosures that lenders are required to send to borrowers following submission of a mortgage application and just prior to the closing." See, for a very indepth industry discussion, this article by Patrick Barnard.

One of the net results is that there's more pages to get to a closing, and the closing will probably end up being extended well beyond the initial escrow period IF there are credits back which must be given a 3-day period to sign on and disclose to the lender.  So if, for example,  the seller agrees to credit the buyer $500 for some repairs rather than perform the repairs, that will require a written documented disclosure to the lender, the total of such amounts may not exceed the lender's cap.  Such a $500 agreement between buyer and seller will require a new good faith estimate from the lender, which in turn adds to costs by some lenders.  Another fact of life is the cost involved for escrow companies and lenders to retool their technology because they will be required to be in sync on this process.

Since this is being  implemented on a national basis, it will affect procedures and laws in all states.  The bottom line for buyers and sellers is that a 30-day escrow may turn into a 45-day escrow, which impacts people's moving plans for making the smallest of changes.

More will be said here on this issue, but the bottom line for residential buyers and sellers is to grasp the transactional costs and fees, including termite inspection (very costly sometimes) and what they agree to agree on with each other in the beginning.  I can see a world of even more advance planning on both sides.

7/11/2014

Maternity Leave is NOT a Reason to Not Get Your Mortgage


Every day we are hearing that many buyers are having a tough time getting a mortgage, and there are real reasons lenders are not giving out loans to certain buyers. But one thing that's not supposed to be happening is discrimination:

Several banks, including Bank of America, PNC Mortgage, Cornerstone Mortgage, and at least one insurer, MGIC, have been found guilty have been penalized for delaying or denying applicants because of pregnancy and/or upcoming maternity leave. We thought such discrimination was behind us, but apparently not.

Lenders see a time of reduced income, and assuming this, have been denying mortgage approvals.  Apparently quite a few women have complained, because the insurer MGIC was guilty of denials for at least 70 women.  Mountain America Credit Union, based in Utah, was also found guilty, in addition to other mortgage insurers.

In spite of the numbers of working mothers in this country, some lenders still believe that a woman's commitment to the workplace diminishes after having a child.  According to MomsRising, a  national advocacy group, three quarters of all mothers are working women.

However, federal law assures an applicant: “Any denial or delay of a mortgage application, according to fair lending regulations, violates the federal Fair Housing Act, which prohibits any form of unequal treatment based on gender or familial status”. 

HUD and the Department of Justice have levied monetary penalties against the offenders, even though they say they are following underwriting guidelines and have done nothing wrong.

Ironically, lenders DO NOT accept the birth of a child as a reason for reduced income or any other financial impact when a distressed borrower applies for a short sale from a lender , so why is it being given as a reason for denial of loan approval?

See this article by Ken Harney: http://www.latimes.com/business/realestate/la-fi-harney-20140706-story.html 

Web Statistics